CaaS vs Contingent Labour

If you've been using the Contingent Labour model, you will be familiar with the following:
- Timesheets, timesheets and more timesheets
- IR35 compliance challenges & risks
- 8-10 week long time-to-hire
- Quality of contractor varies greatly, depends on market availability
- Rates are not standardised, difficult to budget for and predict
So how is CaaS better?

- At least a 50% reduction in time-to-hire: 3-5 weeks
- You consume a service, not individual contractors. No headcounts = no IR35 problems
- An on-demand provision, easily flexed up or down depending on your needs
- A standardised menu of products with weekly & monthly service reports
- Only high-calibre associates are deployed to your project

How many classic pain points can you identify with?